Nuclear energy - France, the facts the LNP hate

Led by serial misinformer (he could never be a spy) Peter Dutton, the #LNP are all rabbiting on about Nuclear Power in GLOWING terms (pun intended). But, as with Dutton’s lie about Canada getting 60% of its power from Nuclear (Yes he said that) they are now leading you astray about France.
Yes, France gets about 60% of its power from nuclear but they also pay the equivalent of 42 cents per kWh, far more than we pay in Australia. And YES they have some real issues, issues that the LNP don’t like talking about. Here are some inconvenient facts:
Non-operational Nuclear Sites:
Sources:
https://energytransition.org/2022/09/what-france-gets-all-wrong-about-nuclear-energy/
https://en.selectra.info/energy-france/guides/electricity/tariffs
- Half of France's 56 nuclear reactors are currently not operational due to various issues such as corrosion problems, extended maintenance schedules, and cooling issues, challenging the perception of nuclear power as a reliable 24/7 energy source.
- A significant portion of France's nuclear generation capacity is shut down because of safety concerns, especially with older reactors that have a higher risk of accidents.
- There have been two serious incidents in France among the 33 worldwide since 1952, highlighting the safety risks associated with nuclear power.
- Historical catastrophic meltdowns, like Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011, underscore the potential for dire repercussions from nuclear accidents.
- Nuclear power has become increasingly expensive, with costs significantly higher than renewable energy sources. It is noted to be at least four times as costly as utility-scale solar and onshore wind power.
- New nuclear sites have seen spiraling costs, making nuclear generation a much less economical choice compared to the rapidly declining costs of renewables and battery storage.
- France's investment in nuclear power requires substantial government support, with new nuclear projects potentially costing French taxpayers tens of billions of euros.
- Europe's current nuclear projects, including France's, are plagued by massive cost overruns and extensive delays. For instance, the Flamanville reactor in France is a decade behind schedule and significantly over budget.
- No new reactor conceived since 2000 in EU Europe has started generating energy, pointing to the inefficiency and slow pace of nuclear power development.
- France's focus on nuclear energy is criticized as a misstep that could hinder its decarbonization efforts and its goal to become carbon neutral by 2050.
- Nuclear power's long development and implementation timelines make it an unsuitable option for meeting urgent climate targets, such as those set for 2030 in the Paris Agreement.
- The reliance on nuclear power has ironically led France to depend more on coal-fired power stations and coal-generated electricity from Germany, as well as on natural gas imports, during energy shortfalls exacerbated by the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Sources:
https://energytransition.org/2022/09/what-france-gets-all-wrong-about-nuclear-energy/
https://en.selectra.info/energy-france/guides/electricity/tariffs